History will remember Robert Mugabe as a brave man who stood by his people. He stood by Africa and he stood by his principles. His only blight will be that he never knew when to leave.
The economic meltdown which has been well chronicled, one sided of course, by the western media will be a saving grace for the “Big Man”.
Mugabe is an independence hero who was darling of the west until about 1999 when he suddenly became a “dictator” in western media coverage.
President Mugabe bold land reforms made him a dictator after years of cordial relations with western world.
And where did the rain start beating?
Zimbabwe earned its independence in 1980. Mugabe had always wanted land reforms just as it had happened in other countries like Kenya. Britain was to give loans and let whites in Zimbabwe sell their land to the government which in turn was to distribute to wananchi. It was to be willing buyer willing seller policy just as it was in Kenya with white highlands in years after independence.
British Prime Minister then the Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher never considered that as a priority. John Major succeeded Thatcher at 10 Downing Street. The only thing that shows on Zimbabwe effort was a flurry of letters between Harare and London.
Then came Tony Blair in 1997. Clare Short was Secretary of State for International Development from 3 May 1997. She was directly involved in the Zimbabwe issue and could not go along with Mugabe.
By this time tension was building in Zimbabwe. People were getting impatient, with 80 percent of the best arable land being owned by white Zimbabweans, almost 20 years of “independence”.
Clare Short in a letter to Mugabe said that British were also colonized and they never sought to get the land back therefore Britain was not willing to help. In essence she dismissed Mugabe.
“I should make it clear that we do not accept that Britain has a special responsibility to meet the costs of land purchase in Zimbabwe. We are a new Government from diverse backgrounds without links to former colonial interests. My own origins are Irish and as you know we were colonized not colonizers”, she wrote in part.
Mugabe went ballistic. With elections round the corner in 2000 and tension building over land, Mugabe was helpless when invasions began. The pent up frustrations against white dominated land ownership in a purportedly independent country had reached melting point.
Invasions did take place and it was messy. Whites were bloodied and chased away. Note that in Namibia and South Africa, whites continue to own over 60 percent of the best land. Mugabe is still labeled as a dictator, and yes, some of the people close to the President benefited more than others.
The Inflation.
The inflation was artificially created. In 2001 President Bush at the urging of Tony Blair got congress to pass the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act of 2001.
The purpose of this Act was to create rebellion against Mugabe from the masses by weakening the economy and thus creating conditions for removal of President Mugabe through popular uprising.
The Act stated US would veto - any extension by the respective institution of any loan, credit, or guarantee to the Government of Zimbabwe; any cancellation or reduction of indebtedness owed by the Government of Zimbabwe to the United States or any international financial institution.
The international financial institutions targeted by this crippling Act were; International Bank for Reconstruction and Development; International Development Association; International Finance Corporation; Inter-American Development Ban; Asian Development Bank;Inter-American Investment Corporation.
Others were the African Development Bank, the African Development Fund, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Multilateral Investment Guaranty Agency.
These two simple acts drove inflation to unimaginable levels. Mugabe stayed put and told his people what was going on. They stuck with him despite the problems.
After all these years the Western governments now realized Mugabe will only go by natural souses, refer to Wikileaks from Zimbabwe ambassador .
The truth is Morgan Tsvangilai who was put up by Western governments has already said it will be difficult to repossess those lands from Black Zimbabweans. That’s the reality.
An ambitious Capricorn with a dream to walk in the moon! Obsessed with books, Politics and Reality TV shows. Welcome to my blog world
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Sunday, October 16, 2011
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Tribute to Steve Jobs 1955-2011
I am still Saddened with the loss of the greatest entrepreneur in history. The world has lost an amazing human being. It's crazy to think about how many people are sharing the news of Steve Jobs death using devices he invented with his brilliance, passion and energy which has improved our lives. The world is immeasurably better because of Steve. He has died aged 56 after a long battle with cancer. His death was announced by Apple in a statement saying: "Apple has lost a visionary and creative genius, and the world has lost an amazing human being.
Without a doubt Steve Jobs will go down in history as the greatest creative entrepreneur. Under the visionary gaze of Steve Jobs, Apple has become the world’s most respected brand for innovation. This inspiring entrepreneur has transformed the way the world relates to computers, software, movies, music, phones, books, magazines and screens. Not only has Steve Job's story inspired millions of entrepreneurs, his innovations have become the platform of choice for some of the most creative people on the planet as well.
Twitter has been flooded with reaction to Jobs' death. The site initially struggled with the deluge of tweets. At one point, five of the site's top 10 trending topics were related to Jobs: RIP Steve Jobs, ThankYouSteve, iHeaven, iClouds and Only 56.
World famous leaders have paid their tributes to the Apple Genius, a great man whose legacy will forever live
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has said: "Steve, thank you for being a mentor and a friend. Thanks for showing that what you build can change the world. I will miss you."
The president of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, has just said:
@MedvedevRussiaE People like Steve Jobs change our world. My sincere condolences to his loved ones and to everyone who admired his intellect and talent
CEO and founder of digital music service Spotify, Daniel Ek, tweets his respects:
@eldsjal Thank you Steve. You were a true inspiration in so many parts of my life, both personal and professional. My hat off to our time's Da Vinci.
Here is Barack Obama's statement in full:
"Michelle and I are saddened to learn of the passing of Steve Jobs. Steve was among the greatest of American innovators - brave enough to think differently, bold enough to believe he could change the world and talented enough to do it.
By building one of the planet's most successful companies from his garage, he exemplified the spirit of American ingenuity. By making computers personal and putting the Internet in our pockets, he made the information revolution not only accessible, but intuitive and fun. And by turning his talents to storytelling, he has brought joy to millions of children and grown-ups alike.
Steve was fond of saying that he lived every day like it was his last. Because he did, he transformed our lives, redefined entire industries and achieved one of the rarest feats in human history: He changed the way each of us sees the world.
The world has lost a visionary. And there may be no greater tribute to Steve's success than the fact that much of the world learned of his passing on a device he invented. Michelle and I send our thoughts and prayers to Steve's wife, Laurene, his family, and all those who loved him."
Larry Page, CEO of Google:
"He was a great man with incredible achievements and amazing brilliance. He always seemed to be able to say in very few words what you actually should have been thinking before you thought it. His focus on the user experience above all else has always been an inspiration to me."
Steve Wozniak, Apple co-founder:
"People sometimes have goals in life. Steve Jobs exceeded every goal he set himself."
Paul Allan, co-founder of Microsoft:
"We've lost a unique tech pioneer and auteur who knew how to make amazingly great products. Steve fought a long battle against tough odds in a very brave way. He kept doing amazing things in the face of all that adversity. As someone who has had his own medical challenges, I couldn't help but be encouraged by how he persevered."
Steve Case, Founder of AOL:
"I feel honored to have known Steve Jobs. He was the most innovative entrepreneur of our generation. His legacy will live on for the ages."
"Windows" may have put a computer in every house, but it was "APPLE" who put one in every pocket. #RIPSteveJobs
Monday, September 26, 2011
Farewell Wangari Maathai, you were a global inspiration – and my heroine (1940-2011)
Wednesday the 6th of July 2011 Wangari Maathai received a honorary doctorate at Copenhagen University and spoke about her work with the Green Belt movement, the Taking Roots movie and more.
The history books are replete with stories of women who changed history. Many of those women, from Cleopatra to Queen Victoria, were born into royalty or power, but there are many examples of women who started out as everyday citizens but went on to change the world.
Wangari Maathai an internationally recognized Icon for her persistent struggle for democracy, human rights and environmental conservation
The history books are replete with stories of women who changed history. Many of those women, from Cleopatra to Queen Victoria, were born into royalty or power, but there are many examples of women who started out as everyday citizens but went on to change the world.
Wangari Maathai an internationally recognized Icon for her persistent struggle for democracy, human rights and environmental conservation
Her death has brought the loss of a great environmental campaigner. Today is a great loss to the African Diaspora and the World. Nobel Peace Prize Winner Wangari Maathai succumbed to Cancer. The Africa Society mourns the loss of this Great African Leader and Environmentalist. Her solution, to work with the poorest and most vulnerable women to repair their own degraded environments and empower themselves, proved inspirational. I have been reading Wangari Maathai’s blogs on peace, environment and democracy One of Kenya‘s most recognizable women, won her Nobel in 2004 for combining science and social activism and a founder of the Green Belt Movement, where over 30 years she mobilized poor women to plant 30 million trees.
Wangari Maathai, almost lost her life trying to secure karura forest. It was this forest that for years represented the underbelly of our government and the dysfunction therein. It was this forest that reminded us that the environment is political. And quite frankly the thought that we can now go there and enjoy a picnic, a walk and some splashing in the river is amazing!
Planting trees became a worldwide symbol of hope and community regeneration. The Green Belt Movement that she started, evolved into one of the first truly worldwide, grassroots, self-help organizations. Over the next 20 years, billions of trees were planted by women around the world as a direct result of her work.
Her anger with the west and her disappointment with a succession of Kenyan governments never abated. But after she unexpectedly won the Nobel peace prize in 2004, she become a powerful voice of African women. From being dismissed by governments as a dissident, she was embraced by them as they turned to the environment as a fig leaf for their other destructive policies
She was a fearless opponent of corruption, a thorn in the side of the male-dominated Kenyan authorities – "that woman", they used to call her – and was never afraid to speak the truth to the most powerful world leaders when they dragged their feet on climate change. She will be remembered on several occasions having addressed the UN and spoke on behalf of women at special sessions. RIP Mama
http://www.greenbeltmovement.orgWednesday, September 21, 2011
Abolish Death Penalty
A busy and exciting week for me, until I notice my TL with lots of people protesting against Troy Davis' death sentence and pleeing for his commutation. It seems unbelievable - unreal - if you were to see it on a TV show or movie.
But it's no TV show or movie. Troy Davis faces possible execution tonight! The clock is ticking on the life of Georgia death row inmate Troy Davis. A judge recently signed his death warrant and the Georgia Department of Corrections has set his execution by lethal injection for the evening of Sept. 21. Yes it is today! The death penalty is a violation of Christian belief and faith…it violates the sanctity of life....Jesus reminded us that he who hasn’t sinned will cast the first stone…When Jesus taught love, he taught mercy. You can’t delegate God’s power to give and take life to the state. Human beings are imperfect; it is impossible to make a perfect justice system with fallible human reason....One innocent death is too much
The death penalty violates the right to life. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. An execution, just like torture, involves a deliberate assault on a prisoner. It is also discriminatory and is often used disproportionately against the poor, the powerless and the marginalized, as well as against people whom repressive governments want to eliminate. The death penalty does not deter crime more than other punishments. International human rights treaties prohibit courts sentencing anyone who was under 18 years old at the time of the crime to death, or executing them. But a small number of countries continue to execute child offenders, violating their obligations under international law.
Troy Davis will be sentenced to death without any physical evidence linking him to the crime. His conviction was based on the testimony of nine witnesses. Since the original trial, seven of the nine have recanted their testimony, citing police coercion and fear of the prime alternative suspect. Evidence of Troy's possible innocence was finally last year heard but ignored by a judge who himself admitted Troy's conviction was "not ironclad." The judge instead ruled that Troy had not "proven innocence" - hardly a standard to be set for the defence in a capital punishment trial. In the testimonies at the new trial, a new eyewitness identified Sylvester "Red" Coles as the actual killer. That witness joins nine others who have signed affidavits pointing to Coles as the real killer.
In logic, an argument is not considered valid if counterexamples exist. Troy's team has shown counterexamples that are reasonable and probable - with even stronger evidence that another person was responsible, than was used to convict Troy. International standards on the death penalty require that any person sentenced to death, have the ability to appeal for clemency. Clemency is the last-ditch effort to avoid a death sentence and it matters not whether one is guilty or innocent. Innocence is of little use it seems, when appealing a death sentence in the courts. This is where clemency is _supposed_ to be used to prevent an execution where serious doubts remain over the conviction or where the punishment does not seem proportional to the circumstances of the crime.
The "system" has failed Troy Davis from day one. Even when granted an unusual request to have a new trial to 'prove his innocence' the system essentially rubber-stamped a conviction that should never of happened. To say with certainty why the system has continued to fail Troy is to speculate somewhat. The crime was a horrendous one - the killing of a police officer. In 1989, Officer Mark Allen MacPhail was shot and killed in Savannah, Georgia. Officer MacPhail was doing off-duty (but Police-uniformed) security work that night. MacPhail was shot to death when he went to assist someone in trouble.
Executing Davis will not achieve 'justice' - even a death penalty advocate would have to conceed that executing the wrong person is more of an insult to the dead officer than imprisoning the perpetrator. October 10th marks the World Day Against the Death Penalty, a day marked to urge countries around the world that still implement capital punishment to abolish it.
Friday, September 16, 2011
Zimbabwean Wikileaks: The Patriots Spoke!!!
The article below was originally written on Sunday,December 12, 2010 as a note on facebookwhen US diplomatic cables were beginning to surface. I have decided to post it as a blog in the light of events taking place within Zimbabwe given the fact that more cables were released pertaining to ZANU-PF, MDC & Zimbabwe Security Agencies. With hindsight, it is evident that there are still a lot of people within Zimbabwe, particularly ZANU-PF who are eager to see things changes for the good. I will pen another blog to analyze the current scenario further after going through most of the cables.
My friend Runyamhere from Zimbabwe a blogger shared his thoughts about wiki-leaks which I found pretty much interesting to share as well. I love reading wide about Zims and my pals think maybe I should re-locate there! The History of The Africa continent is wide and very interesting! Proud of my skin color and the beautiful continent. regardless of the unending problems we are facing. Much read and write up about land issues in SA and Kenya coming up as promised earlier. Share in your thoughts on this article
There has been animosity toward Wikileaks releasing information detailing PM Morgan Tsvangirai's conversations with US Embassy, ZANU PF sympathizers have jumped to highlight that Morgan was urging sanctions. Well if I was in his position I would advocate the same, imagine ZANU PF without target sanctions, how would the shopping trips to fashion cities like Madrid, Paris be? Then there is the issue of stashing wealth. Truth is these people's preferred place is the west, the look east is just sour grapes, if sanctions are removed you will see, deep down Mugabe has admiration for UK, they made him, his style et al has a Buckingham signature about it, enough of this, let's talk business.
I have a note posted before this one detailing the life & aspirations of Julius Assange and his purpose for Wikileaks. He is an advocate of a free society where governments have to be transparent and information is not withheld from the populace. This is one thing that makes me believe in his cause, how many clandestine deals are done by governments, in South Africa there is the famous arms scandal for example, in Zimbabwe far too many to mention from the seventies up to present, how nice it would be to have the rumours confirmed by hard facts e.g. findings of Dumbutshena Commission, the Willowgate scandal, disappearance of many political figures. Zimbabwe is a gold mine for the most astounding leaks ever if not the most gruesome. Knowing this I am upbeat about Wikileaks.
It is important to understand how Wikileaks operate, though Julian Assange is a very good Cryptographer who learnt hacking (he started hacking at about 10 years), he now uses his exceptional wisdom to create and maintain a system that ensures information passed to Wikileaks cannot be sniffed to uncover its origin or source. With regard to the US Embassy cables, many say Bradley Manning is the source but I doubt it, he might be the easy scapegoat. So Wikileaks relies on leaks at points within the systems, once they receive it, they verify it for authenticity prior to publishing. From here we can see that for leaks to occur there must be the following:
1. Some corruption or underhand dealing, terror plan, a repression etc.
2. A person within the system bold enough to say enough is enough.
3. A person who feels what is happening does not bode well with democracy or what is acceptable.
4. A conviction to stand for what is right.
I have a note posted before this one detailing the life & aspirations of Julius Assange and his purpose for Wikileaks. He is an advocate of a free society where governments have to be transparent and information is not withheld from the populace. This is one thing that makes me believe in his cause, how many clandestine deals are done by governments, in South Africa there is the famous arms scandal for example, in Zimbabwe far too many to mention from the seventies up to present, how nice it would be to have the rumours confirmed by hard facts e.g. findings of Dumbutshena Commission, the Willowgate scandal, disappearance of many political figures. Zimbabwe is a gold mine for the most astounding leaks ever if not the most gruesome. Knowing this I am upbeat about Wikileaks.
It is important to understand how Wikileaks operate, though Julian Assange is a very good Cryptographer who learnt hacking (he started hacking at about 10 years), he now uses his exceptional wisdom to create and maintain a system that ensures information passed to Wikileaks cannot be sniffed to uncover its origin or source. With regard to the US Embassy cables, many say Bradley Manning is the source but I doubt it, he might be the easy scapegoat. So Wikileaks relies on leaks at points within the systems, once they receive it, they verify it for authenticity prior to publishing. From here we can see that for leaks to occur there must be the following:
1. Some corruption or underhand dealing, terror plan, a repression etc.
2. A person within the system bold enough to say enough is enough.
3. A person who feels what is happening does not bode well with democracy or what is acceptable.
4. A conviction to stand for what is right.
![]() |
| Nothing Describes The Events in Zimbabwe Better |
Given the afore-mentioned, how many people in Zimbabwe joined the army to genuinely defend the citizens of Zimbabwe? How many members of CIO are tired of the status-quo but feel hemmed in? How many members of the police force are right thinking, undefiled citizens who witness torture or even engage in it against their conscience? If you make a mind map I am sure you can find many such within the system. So we can rightly say there are many men and women who meet the above, who have the same feeling as Winston Smith of George Orwell's 1984. People willing to stand up for righteousness but feel too insignificant to do anything, hitherto their outlet was newspapers only whose Editors were at times informed by fear and backtracked, ladies & gentlemen, Wikileaks might be a platform we can use to counter injustice, make the voice of those trapped within the system count.
As it is we are going into an election period, chances are those against the will of the people have designed a road map, could this be in print, on hard disk, pen drive, on e-mail, fax, PABX record? Any of these media is accessible to secretaries, agents or employees, which is where we need the super-patriots to stand up for what is right, to give the system a middle finger, in a small way we can make a big impact to change the course of the future forever for the truth is our gateway to freedom.
We all have relatives, friends, wives, husbands, nephews, nieces, neighbours who work within the system; we recall many a times they told us of some information of a confidential nature or murmured that things must change but both of you ended up helpless on the next step, well now Wikileaks is a viable option. The voice of reason must be heard and deliver us from tyranny and yoke of bondage.
So ladies and gentleman, I appeal to everyone to keep this at the back of their minds, instead of clamoring for Wikileaks to be done away with, it might be the best thing we need to deal with a secretive regime, bring change to our people. By change I do not mean an MDC or opposition government, it can be an awakening within ZANU PF itself to do the right thing, here change means our nation choosing to build itself, to do right, to grant freedom to everyone and ensure political prosperity for the citizens.
We have postponed our freedom for too long, we do not seem to find an outlet to channel collective efforts but for this last hurdle every avenue must be explored, a decade of suffering is too long, the urgency of delivering democracy has reached a crescendo, together we can do more.
Let us help ourselves, let the information flow, there is no CIO, ZANU, MDC, ZRP, Zimbabwe is bigger than all these, let's put our nation first, party affiliation second & self-interest last.
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Africa's dream in Claiming the 21st Century.
Haven’t been here for days and feel as though am oxygen deprived. So much work to finalize before I start on a new chapter. Knowledge management has contributed a lot to my liking in blogging about leadership in Africa. Thanks to our well equipped resource centre. Had a very interesting discussion with friends on Sunday which all started with the Mafia rule in Barzani. Anyone who thinks that Mafia is breathing its last breath is just wrong. Mafias still reap ill-gotten gains from traditional sources. They still have some control over corrupt contractors and unions and illegal gambling which continues as a primary source of wealth and they've also diversified, crafting new scams befitting a new century. This I will have to do a lot of reading and research before I do a write-up before week-end. That aside, we got to engage on issues about Africa and the endless problems we are facing in the 21st century.
Despite gains in the second half of the 1990s, Sub-Saharan Africa (Africa) enters the 21st century with many of the world's poorest countries. Average income per capita is lower than at the end of the 1960s. Incomes, assets, and access to essential services are unequally distributed. And the region contains a growing share of the world's absolute poor, who have little power to influence the allocation of resources. Moreover, many development problems have become largely confined to Africa. They include lagging primary school enrollments, high child mortality, and endemic diseases - including malaria and HIV/AIDS - that impose costs on Africa at least twice those in any other developing region. To make matters worse, Africa's place in the global economy has been eroded, with declining export shares in traditional primary products, little diversification into new lines of business, and massive capital flight and loss of skills to other regions. Now the region stands in danger of being excluded from the information revolution.
Many countries have made important economic reforms, improving macroeconomic management, liberalizing markets and trade, and widening the space for private sector activity. Where these reforms have been sustained - and underpinned by civil peace - they have raised growth and incomes and reduced poverty. Even as parts of the region are making headlines with wars and natural disasters, other parts are making headway with rising interest from domestic and foreign businesses and higher investment.
But the response has not been sufficient to overcome years of falling income or to reverse other adverse legacies from the long period of economic decline - including deteriorated capacity, weakened institutions, and inadequate infrastructure. Major changes are needed if Africans - and their children - are to claim the 21 st century. With the region's rapidly growing population, 5 percent annual growth is needed simply to keep the number of poor from rising. Halving severe poverty by 2015 will require annual growth of more than 7 percent, along with a more equitable distribution of income.
Moreover, Africa will not be able to sustain rapid growth without investing in its people. Many lack the health, education, and access to inputs needed to contribute to - and benefit from - high growth. Women are one of Africa's hidden growth reserves, providing most of the region's labor, but their productivity is hampered by widespread inequality in education and access. Thus gender equality can be a potent force for accelerated poverty reduction. And HIV/AIDS looms as a new menace, threatening to cut life expectancy by 20 years and undermine savings, growth, and the social fabric in many countries.
Africa thus faces an immense, multifaceted development challenge. But the new century offers a window of opportunity to reverse the marginalization of Africa's people - and of Africa's governments, relative to donors, in the development agenda. Political participation has increased sharply in the past decade, paving the way for more accountable government, and there is greater consensus on the need to move away from the failed models of the past. With the end of the Cold War, Africa is no longer an ideological and strategic battleground where ``trusted allies'' receive foreign assistance regardless of their record on governance and development. Globalization and new technology, especially information technology, offer great potential for Africa, historically a sparsely populated, isolated region. Though these factors also pose risks, including that of being left further behind, these are far outweighed by the potential benefits.
Making these benefits materialize will require a ``business plan'' conceived and owned by Africans, and supported by donors through coordinated, long-term partnerships. African countries differ widely, so there is no universal formula for success. But many countries face similar issues, and can draw on positive African examples of how to address them.
Improving governance and resolving conflict is perhaps the most basic requirement for faster development. Widespread civil conflicts impose enormous costs, including on neighboring countries. Contrary to popular belief, Africa's conflicts do not stem from ethnic diversity. Rather, in a pattern found around the world, conflicts are driven by poverty, underdevelopment, and lack of economic diversification, as well as by political systems that marginalize large parts of the population. But conflicts perpetuate poverty, creating a vicious circle that can be reversed only through special development efforts - including long run peace building and political reforms. With success in these areas, countries can grow rapidly.
Countries that have made the greatest gains in political participation are also those with better economic management. Again, this conforms to a global pattern that suggests multiethnic states can grow as fast as homogeneous ones - if they sustain participatory political systems. Many countries need to develop political models that facilitate consensus building and include marginalized groups.
Programs should empower citizens to hold governments accountable, enable governments to respond to new demands, and enforce compliance with the economic and political rules of the game. Development efforts are starting to move in this direction, with greater beneficiary involvement in the delivery of services and more emphasis on results. But far more needs to be done to strengthen Africa's institutions - including ensuring that representative institutions, such as parliaments, play their proper role in economic and budgetary oversight.
Investing in people is also essential for accelerated poverty reduction. Many countries are caught in a trap of high fertility and mortality, low education, high dependency ratios, and low savings. In addition, greater political commitment is urgently needed to fight HIV/AIDS.
While the resources available for education and health are inadequate in some countries, many need to translate their existing commitment to human development into effective programs for delivering essential services and increasing gender equality. Africa has some of the world's strongest communities, yet services are usually provided through weak, centralized institutions that are seen as remote and ineffective by those they are supposed to serve. De-concentrated service delivery through local communities, supported by capacity building at local levels and effective governance to ensure transparency and empower recipients, could have a major impact.
Increasing competitiveness and diversifying economies must be a third area of focus if Africa is to claim the new century. Job creation is slow not because of labor market rigidities (though there are exceptions) but because of the high perceived risks and costs of doing business in Africa. These need to be lowered by locking in reforms and delivering business services more efficiently - with less corruption, better infrastructure and financial services, and increased access to the information economy. Africa trails the world on every dimension of these essentials. Lowering these barriers requires new approaches, including more participation by the private sector and by local communities, a more regional approach to overcome the problems posed by small African economies, and a central government shift to regulating and facilitating services rather than providing them.
Though Africa's agriculture has responded to limited reforms, it remains backward and under capitalized, the result of centuries of extractive policies. Recapitalizing the sector will require maintaining and improving price incentives (by encouraging competitive input markets), channeling more public spending and foreign aid to rural communities (including local infrastructure), and tapping into the savings potential of farmers. These changes are also needed to create incentives to reverse severe environmental degradation. Public-private partnerships can make a contribution, in agricultural research and extension, where a regional approach would also help.
Since the late 1960s Africa's loss of world trade has cost it almost $70 billion a year, reflecting a failure to diversify into new, dynamic products as well as a falling market share for traditional goods. Africa's trade reforms have mostly been negotiated with donors as part of adjustment programs. Reforms still need to be embedded in a development strategy that is export oriented, anchored on competitive and stable real exchange rates, and enables exporters to access imported inputs at world prices. Governments need to increase consultations with business, working to develop world class service standards. Here again a regional approach is vital, not only to encourage intra-African trade flows but perhaps more important, to provide a wider platform to encourage investment. African countries need to work together to participate in the global negotiations that shape the world trading system. The capacity requirements for this are too great for small, poor countries.
Reducing aid dependence and strengthening partnerships will have to be a fourth component of Africa's development strategy. Africa is the world's most aid dependent and indebted region. Concessional assistance is essential if Africa is to grow rapidly while also increasing consumption to reduce poverty.
High debt and debt service add to the problem, deterring private investment and absorbing core budget resources, making governments ever more ``cash poor'' but ``project rich,'' with a development agenda increasingly perceived as being shaped by donors. Lack of selectivity compounds the problem, channeling a lot of aid to countries with poor development policies. And with few exceptions, aid has largely been confined to national boundaries rather than used to stimulate regional and international public goods.
These problems are widely recognized, and a consensus has emerged that the primary goal of aid should be to reduce poverty. But paradoxically, aid transfers are declining just when many of the problems are being addressed. Africa enters the new century in the midst of intense debate on aid, including what could be a watershed change in its relationship with the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, as well as important changes in development cooperation with the European Union and an enhanced program of debt relief. New aid relationships are being implemented in a number of countries - relationships that emphasize a holistic, country driven approach supported by donors on the basis of long-term partnerships, and with greater beneficiary participation and empowerment over the use of resources.
It also remains to be seen how far partnerships can extend beyond assistance, to include enhanced opening of world markets to African products and services.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





